smt

Checklist Notes and Comments
The Procedure vendor foxlink
1 Is there an operator Work Instruction for the specific product being built?
在生產現場是否備有一份產品作業指導書 ? ( Work Instruction )
2 Is the WI revision controlled and updated?
作業指導書(WI) 是否利用版本管制並及時更新?
3 Is the WI readily available to the operator at the station?
該站作業員容易看到作業指導書 ?
4 Does the WI list the machines, equipment, tools, and fixture to be used?
作業指導書是否列出以下清單,即:工作所必須的機器.裝備.工具及被用到的治具?
5 Does the WI list the machine and equipment program name and revision to be used?
作業指導書WI是否列出機器和儀器程式名稱和使用版本?
6 Does the WI list the machine and equipment settings to be used?
作業指導書 ( Work Instruction )是否列出所必須的機器和設備正常工作下的設定條件?
7 Is there a system to verify correct test program has been downloaded?
是否有一個系統驗證正確的測試程式已經被下載?
8 Is the Pcba part number and revision specified on the work Instruction?
wi上是否有詳細標明pcba之料號與版本?
9 Is the WI simple and clear enough such that an operator with basic training can follow it to perform the job?
WI是否足夠簡易和清晰以便即使僅受過基礎訓練的作業員也能遵循WI完成工作?
10 Is the working instructions revision controlled and approved by authorized personnel prior to issue
wi的修正控管與承認在發布之前是否已經授權人員批准
11 Is the log updated and complete?
是否有up-date 完整的工作記錄? ( 報表 流程單 --- 等)
The Operator (作業員)
12 Is the operator certified to perform the operation, or is he/she supervised by a certified operator?
作業員是否被確認能勝任其工作,或他/她的工作由已被確認的作業員加以督導?
13 Is the operator wearing ESD wrist strap in handling ESD sensitive materials?
在碰觸對靜電敏感的元件時,作業員是否配戴靜電環?
14 Is there an updated daily record of operator checking the ESD wrist strap continuity?
是否具備一份UPDATED每日報表,用以檢查作業員堅持配戴靜電環情況?
15 Is the operator following the WI?
作業員是否嚴格遵循WI?
16 Is the operator handling the materials properly to avoid damage or mixing?
作業員是否正確處理材料,以避免材料破損或混料?
17 When handling the PCB or PCBA, is the operator wearing gloves if PCB solder side is touched ?
當處理PCB或PCBA時,如果PCB的錫面被碰觸,作業員是否配戴手套?
The Material 材料
18 Do all the parts used match the WI?
.所有所使用到的零件是否均與WI相符?
19 Are all the parts used identified clearly (P/N, description, location, quantity) such that only correct parts are used?
所有零件是否嚴格的加以確認(P/N, 特性, 位置, 用量),以確保僅有正確零件方可使用?
20 Are all the parts stored properly to avoid mixing and damage?
是否所有零件都加以正確儲存,以避免混料和材料破損?
21 Are all ESD sensitive parts stored in anti-ESD container?
是否所有對靜電敏感的元件均被儲存在防靜電盒內?
22 Does the WI specified that the operator should check all parts before the operation?
WI是否明確規定,在操作前作業員應檢查所有零件正確與否?
23 Is the component loading set-up cross-checked by another operator before machine start-up?
在機器起動之前,零件的裝放是否設置了相互交叉檢查的動作?
24 Is there a log signed by the set-up operator and countersigned by the cross check operator before start-up?
在機器起動之前,零件的重新裝放設置了由另一個作業員完成的相互交叉檢查之動作?
25 Is there a system to verify the first board has been built correctly?
是否有建立一個系統驗證首件是否正確?
26 Is there a log signed by the operator and countersigned by the cross check operator before machine restart?
在機器重開機前被另一作業員交叉檢查簽名及記錄?
27 Is there a flow to ensure all product are being tested inclusive of rework board ?
是否有建立一個流程來確認產品全數測試過包含重工板
The Machine, Equipment, Tool, and Fixture 機器. 設備. 工具和治具
28 Are the tools, and fixtures properly identified?
工具和設施是否加以正確確認?
29 Do the machines and equipment settings match the WI?
機器和設備的工作環境是否與WI相符?
30 Do the machine and equipment program name used match the WI?
.機器和設備的程式名稱是否與WI相符?
31 Are the machines and equipment program protected from unauthorized tampering?
.機器和設備所用的程式是否加以"寫保護",以避免非正式的篡改?
32 Is there a trigger limit for machine reject rate ?
機器拒收比例是否有限定?
33 Is the operation conducted in a enclosed and controlled environment?
作業是否是在全封閉和受控的狀態環境中進行的?
34 Is the machine bed free from fallout component?
機台是否加以防護,以免落下零件損壞機台?
35 Are the machines, equipment, tools, and fixture checked at the start of each shift?
在每一次換班的開始,機器設備, 工具, 固定設施均有檢查過?
36 Are the machines, equipment, tools, and fixture checked after any adjustment or model change?
在機器.設備.工具和固定設施在進行了任何調整或模式切換後,是否加以檢查過?
37 Is there an updated record of the above checking?
以上檢查項目之報表是否UPDATED?
38 Is there a comprehensive Preventive Maintenance Plan and updated record?
是否具備一份綜合預防性維護計劃和UPDATED報告?
39 As the same ICT fixture is used for different PCA part numbers, does the Batch file differentiate?
是否有投入一批來比較使用相同ICT設備測試不同PCA之差異?
40 Is there a foolproof matrix to indicate that product A will not pass ICT if Batch File B is used?
是否使用防錯，產品A不合格假如使用檔案B即能使用?
41 Is there a foolproof matrix to indicate that product B will not pass ICT if Batch File A is used?
是否使用防錯，產品B不合格假如使用檔案A即能使用?
42 Is the machine cleaned at least once every 24 hours
機臺之清潔至少每24H執行一次?
The Output 輸出
43 Are the PCBA properly identified by their P/N, status, and traceability information?
PCBA是否根據它們的P/N,作用,可追溯信息對其加以嚴格確認?
44 Are the PCBA properly stored to avoid mixing or damage?
PCBA是否被正確儲備,以避免混料或破損?
45 Are the ESD sensitive PCBA properly stored to avoid ESD damage?
.對靜電敏感的PCBA是否正確儲備,以避免靜電損壞?
46 Does the operator should check all the products after the operation?
WI是否明確規定,在操作完畢後作業員應檢查所有的產品?
47 Is revision controlled sample, visual aid, or template used to check the outputted board?
是否使用受控樣品,目檢方式和模板來檢查產出的 PCB之狀態是否合格?
48 Do the PCBAs meet the workmanship standard?
PCBA是否滿足工藝標准?
49 Does the ICT/Functional test measure critical parameters ? Is it sufficient?
ict/功能測試其所使用之量測參數是足夠的?
50 Is the total test coverage (including ICT and Functional test) greater than 95%?
總體測試是否>95%(含ict與功能測試)
51 Are all repaired boards identified on repair location for traceability?
維修板於維修位置是否有標記以便於往後追蹤?
52 Is reworked PCBA re-input to manufacturing test and inspection stations?
維修之PCBA是否有再投入產線測試與檢查?
53 Is SPC implemented and the chart updated?
有無使用SPC CHART管制產品及UPDATED?
54 Is the untested components identified?
未測試組成之驗證方法?
55 Does the supplier establish a process to verify untested components?
供應商是否建立一個程序在驗證未測試之組成
56 Is the non-conformance analyzed by appointed person?
是否有專人解析不合格品?
57 Are the test/inspection marking removed prior to re-input to manufacturing line?
檢驗與測試之標記是否與再一次投入產線有所區分?
Maximum Score 114 114 Rev.:B(05.01.2006)
Score Obtained 0 0 Yes=2
Score Percentage No good=1
Pass Percentage 75% 75% NO=0