XbarR 和ANOVA两种方法分析的不同结果

Gage R&R Study - ANOVA Method

Two-Way ANOVA Table With Interaction

Source DF SS MS F P
Part 9 0.0006080 0.0000676 6.4138 0.000
Operator 2 0.0000149 0.0000074 0.7058 0.507
Part * Operator 18 0.0001896 0.0000105 35.1070 0.000
Repeatability 60 0.0000180 0.0000003
Total 89 0.0008304


Gage R&R

%Contribution
Source VarComp (of VarComp)
Total Gage R&R 0.0000037 36.94
Repeatability 0.0000003 2.99
Reproducibility 0.0000034 33.95
Operator 0.0000000 0.00
Operator*Part 0.0000034 33.95
Part-To-Part 0.0000063 63.06
Total Variation 0.0000100 100.00


Study Var %Study Var %Tolerance
Source StdDev (SD) (6 * SD) (%SV) (SV/Toler)
Total Gage R&R 0.0019263 0.0115579 60.78 44.45
Repeatability 0.0005477 0.0032863 17.28 12.64
Reproducibility 0.0018468 0.0110808 58.27 42.62
Operator 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.00 0.00
Operator*Part 0.0018468 0.0110808 58.27 42.62
Part-To-Part 0.0025170 0.0151021 79.41 58.09
Total Variation 0.0031696 0.0190173 100.00 73.14

Number of Distinct Categories = 1


Gage R&R Study - XBar/R Method

%Contribution
Source VarComp (of VarComp)
Total Gage R&R 0.0000005 7.11
Repeatability 0.0000003 3.93
Reproducibility 0.0000002 3.19
Part-To-Part 0.0000067 92.89
Total Variation 0.0000072 100.00


Study Var %Study Var %Tolerance
Source StdDev (SD) (6 * SD) (%SV) (SV/Toler)
Total Gage R&R 0.0007155 0.0042931 26.67 16.51
Repeatability 0.0005316 0.0031896 19.82 12.27
Reproducibility 0.0004789 0.0028735 17.85 11.05
Part-To-Part 0.0025856 0.0155136 96.38 59.67
Total Variation 0.0026828 0.0160967 100.00 61.91


Number of Distinct Categories = 5


请问在零件和评价人之间存在明显交互作用时,该接受哪一个分析结论,请高手指点