关于自动测量仪器的G R&R
师兄们：
我们这有一台自动测量仪自动判断合格与否，有合格，高，底，报废四种结果，是离散性数据，现在要做ＧＲ＆Ｒ，理论上分析只有机器的重复性，用minitab的G R&R也分析不出。有同事用以下方法进行分析，请问在minitab15（正版）中如何操作，如何分析，如何判定。另外，有其他方法可得出结论也请不吝赐教。如能制作PPT截图，将不胜感激。
Assessment Agreement
Within Appraisers
Assessment Agreement
Appraiser # Inspected # Matched Percent 95 % CI
A 12 11 91.67 (61.52, 99.79)
# Matched: Appraiser agrees with him/herself across trials.
Each Appraiser vs Standard
Assessment Agreement
Appraiser # Inspected # Matched Percent 95 % CI
A 12 11 91.67 (61.52, 99.79)
# Matched: Appraiser's assessment across trials agrees with the known standard.
谢谢！
Frank
May 22 2008
我们这有一台自动测量仪自动判断合格与否，有合格，高，底，报废四种结果，是离散性数据，现在要做ＧＲ＆Ｒ，理论上分析只有机器的重复性，用minitab的G R&R也分析不出。有同事用以下方法进行分析，请问在minitab15（正版）中如何操作，如何分析，如何判定。另外，有其他方法可得出结论也请不吝赐教。如能制作PPT截图，将不胜感激。
Assessment Agreement
Within Appraisers
Assessment Agreement
Appraiser # Inspected # Matched Percent 95 % CI
A 12 11 91.67 (61.52, 99.79)
# Matched: Appraiser agrees with him/herself across trials.
Each Appraiser vs Standard
Assessment Agreement
Appraiser # Inspected # Matched Percent 95 % CI
A 12 11 91.67 (61.52, 99.79)
# Matched: Appraiser's assessment across trials agrees with the known standard.
谢谢！
Frank
May 22 2008
没有找到相关结果
已邀请:
RSS Feed
4 个回复
Jeff_wang (威望:3) (江苏 )
赞同来自:
2 如果是连续型数据，使用minitab的GR&R study (crossed)，只是将Operators一栏留空即可，运行后只评价重复性。
如果是离散型数据（如Go, No-go之类），有另外的GRR评价计算方式。