TS审核不合格项 大家来写原因分析和纠正措施

不合格项1
Supplier performance monitoring did not include objective performance monitoring.
2009年供方绩效监控没覆盖客观绩效的监控；
Requirements 要求:
Supplier performance shall be monitored through the following indicators 供方业绩应通过以下指标进行监视:
-.delivered product quality 交付产品的质量;
-. customer disruptions including field returns 顾客生产中断包括外部退货;
-. delivery schedule performance (including incidents of premium freight) 按计划交付的业绩（包括附加运费情况）;
-. special status customer notifications related to quality or delivery issues关于质量或交付问题异常情况的顾客通知.
Evidence 证据:
Delivered product PPM and premium freight was not included in supplier performance evaluation of 2009.
2009年的供方绩效监控中，没有包含交付产品PPM和超额运费。



不合格项2
Layout inspection and functional testing did not implement completely to ensure all products were covered. 全尺寸检验没有有效地实施以确保所有的产品均被覆盖。
Requirement:-
A layout inspection and a functional verification to applicable customer engineering material and performance standards shall be performed for each product as specified in the control plans. Results shall be available for customer review. 应根据适用的顾客工程材料及性能标准，按控制计划的规定，对每一种产品进行全尺寸检验和功能验证。其结果应可供顾客评审。
Evidence observed:-
Layout inspection and functional testing for product 6300.02 did not perform.
2008年6300.02产品的全尺寸检验和功能试验没有进行。


不合格项 3
Equipment mgt. was not implemented to ensure preventive maintenance implementation effectively.生产设备的管理不能确保所有的预防性维护有效地实施。
Requirement:-
The organization shall identify key process equipment and provide resources for machine/equipment maintenance and develop an effective planned total preventive maintenance system. As a minimum, this system shall include the following:
-.planned maintenance activities;
组织应识别关键过程设备，为机器/设备的维护提供资源，并建立有效的、有计划的全面预防性维护系统。这个系统至少应包括：
——有计划的维护活动；
Evidence observed:-
Maintenance record of July, 2009 for milling line was available required in Maintenance Plan of 2009.
2009年的年度维护计划中，没有证据证明7月份对挤出线进行了维护保养。


不合格项4
Manufacturing process was not implemented completely to ensure that all process was controlled. 制造过程没有完全有效地实施以确保所有的生产工艺得到控制。
Requirements 要求:
The organization shall plan and carry out production and service provision under controlled conditions.
组织应策划并在受控条件下进行生产和服务提供。
Evidence 证据:
During production of 3470.01, external milling speed requirement was 7±1, actual set up was 8.5; Tooling requirement was 22.7-22.9, actual used tooling was 23.7.
2009年3470.01产品的生产中，外挤出工序的速度要求为7±1，而实际设置为8.5；使用的工装内头要求为22.7－22.9，而实际使用的是23.7的内头。


不合格项5
Requirements 要求:
The organization shall develop a control plan that includes, as a minimum, the following contents.
b) Product control/ other characteristics for control (number, product or process),
c) Process control/ process parameters,
组织应开发一个至少包括以下内容的控制计划，
b) 产品控制/ 其它控制的特性（数字，产品或过程）；
c) 过程控制/ 过程参数；
Evidence 证据:
No process parameter description of thin milling process and no product requirement of molding and vulcanizing process in CP for project LEMA 6062.03 developed on Aug., 2008.
2008年8月开发的LEMA 6062.03项目的控制计划中，挤出工序没有过程参数的描述，硫化工序没有产品要求的描述；


不合格项6
DFMEA process can’t ensure all the failure mode was covered. 失效模式分析不能那个确保涵盖所有的失效模式。
Requirement:-
The product design output shall be expressed in terms that can be verified and validated against product design input requirements. The product design output shall include

[]design FMEA, reliability results,[/]

产品设计输出应以能够对照产品设计输入要求进行验证和确认的形式来表示。产品设计输出应包括：
——设计FMEA，可靠性结果；
Evidence observed:-
Failure mode of low temperature function was not covered for the project LEMA 6062.03 developed on Aug., 2008.
2008年8月开发的 6062.03项目，DFEMA没有覆盖低温性能的失效模式；

不合格项7
The organization’s process of Customer Satisfaction was not effectively in ensuring that the performance of the realization processes were analyzed.组织的客户满意过程没有有效运行以保证分析实际的业绩。
Requirement:-
Customer satisfaction with the organization shall be monitored through continual evaluation of performance of the realization processes. 顾客对组织的满意应通过对（产品）实现过程业绩的持续评价进行监视。
Evidence observed:-
The customer report was only based on Customer Satisfaction Survey, the delivery performance was not analyzed, such as premium freight and delivered product PPM. 顾客满意度报告仅仅基于顾客满意度调查表，实际的交付业绩没有分析，如超额运费，交付产品的PPM。