VDA 1 Quality Envidence
Quality Envidence-Guidelines for documentation and archivinig of quality requirements and quality system.
Demonstration of Proof (证据证明)
There are several reasons, why you want to prove, that the quality has been or can be reached as planned in accordance with the defined requirements. In general, documented quality requirements and the related inspection results (quality documents) are required, in order to demonstrate this proof. But this proof can also be shown by the demonstration or representation of the process that has been intended to be the one leading to quality, or by a marking on the product showing that the product has undergone defined tests successfully. 有很多理由让你想去证明质量已经已经或者能够达到如计划要求所愿。一般来说,为了证明这些证据,文件化的质量要求和相关的检验结果(质量文件)是必需的。但是这些证据也可以用代表的过程来阐述,这些过程是导向质量的,或者用体现在产品上的标识来表明产品按要求进行的测试是成功的。
Also, not all requirements can be defined in a document - i.e. on paper or in an electronic way -, for example, characteristics that can technically not be completely described, which will then be defined by a master sample. 当然,并不是所有的要求都能够在文件中进行定义,比如在纸上或者以电子信息的方式,例如,特性不能完全进行技术上的描述,这个时候可以用限度样品进行定义。
On the other hand, defined requirements can not be tested 100 % (destructive testing!) and can therefore not be registered either. In this case the safety of the related manufacturing processes may be tested and registered. 另一方面,定义的要求不可能100%的测试(破坏性实验),因此也就不能被承认(不知道“register”在这里怎么翻译好)。在这种情况下,相关制造过程的安全性也许可以进行测试或者承认。
Demonstration of Proof (证据证明)
There are several reasons, why you want to prove, that the quality has been or can be reached as planned in accordance with the defined requirements. In general, documented quality requirements and the related inspection results (quality documents) are required, in order to demonstrate this proof. But this proof can also be shown by the demonstration or representation of the process that has been intended to be the one leading to quality, or by a marking on the product showing that the product has undergone defined tests successfully. 有很多理由让你想去证明质量已经已经或者能够达到如计划要求所愿。一般来说,为了证明这些证据,文件化的质量要求和相关的检验结果(质量文件)是必需的。但是这些证据也可以用代表的过程来阐述,这些过程是导向质量的,或者用体现在产品上的标识来表明产品按要求进行的测试是成功的。
Also, not all requirements can be defined in a document - i.e. on paper or in an electronic way -, for example, characteristics that can technically not be completely described, which will then be defined by a master sample. 当然,并不是所有的要求都能够在文件中进行定义,比如在纸上或者以电子信息的方式,例如,特性不能完全进行技术上的描述,这个时候可以用限度样品进行定义。
On the other hand, defined requirements can not be tested 100 % (destructive testing!) and can therefore not be registered either. In this case the safety of the related manufacturing processes may be tested and registered. 另一方面,定义的要求不可能100%的测试(破坏性实验),因此也就不能被承认(不知道“register”在这里怎么翻译好)。在这种情况下,相关制造过程的安全性也许可以进行测试或者承认。