您还没有绑定微信,更多功能请点击绑定

第十一篇——Using Six Sigma to Solve Issues in Public School System

本帖最后由 小编H 于 2011-2-25 11:06 编辑

请对以下文章有翻译兴趣的组员留下你的预计完成时间,并发短信息联系小编H,以便小编登记翻译者信息以及文章最终完成时的奖惩工作。

PS:请翻译者务必联系小编,以便确认翻译者以及把原文文档发到翻译者邮箱~~~


原文:

Using Six Sigma to Solve Issues in Public School System Of all the innovative applications for Six Sigma, none may be as interesting as one being used in Colorado – applying Six Sigma to all aspects of a public school system. And "all aspects" includes the heart of any school district – the classroom. By Mary Ruff, iSixSigma Staff Writer Of all the new and innovative applications for Six Sigma, none may be as interesting as one being used in the state of Colorado – applying Six Sigma to all aspects of a public school system. And "all aspects" includes the heart of every school district – the classroom. Two years ago, businessman Jim Weigel, who was president of the school board for Adams County School District 12 in Thornton, Colo., USA, gave his fellow board members an unusual holiday gift. Each of them received a copy of the book The Six Sigma Way (McGraw-Hill, 2000) by Peter Pande, Robert Neuman and Roland Cavanagh. Their assignment for the holiday break was to read it and be ready to discuss it at the first school board meeting in the new year. Wiegel's company manufactured granite countertops, and as a Six Sigma practitioner he was familiar with the methodology's potential for improving production processes. But he knew he had a tough sell convincing the school board and the faculty of Six Sigma's value to them. Although many of them agreed in theory that the methodology could be applied to any process, when it came to education, they were less sure. They agreed, however, to investigate training programs and consultants who might take on this challenge. The task was not a small one. The objective was to apply Six Sigma to everything in the school district. The first hurdle was to find a consultant who would work with a public school system. After a few inquiries and false starts, consultant Peter Pande agreed to work with the district. He did leadership training and showed school leaders how Six Sigma could work for the district. Turning Teachers' Skepticism into InterestThe most important thing the consultant did for school personnel, including teachers, was to turn their skepticism into interest. Using the case study of a radio broadcasting company, he demonstrated how a system with many flaws could be improved by a careful, thorough application of Six Sigma. Faculty and staff saw how the radio company helped itself by using a step-by-step method to look at all aspects of a process, from identifying and quantifying problems, to analyzing, improving and finally controlling a process. To this day, district teachers remember the radio company case study, and how a messed-up system was fixed by applying the principles they learned. In the meantime, enter Brian Hodges. An assistant principal who wanted to solve some issues within the school system, Hodges had had statistics training and was familiar with Six Sigma. He seemed a natural fit for a new school district position – quality improvement process evaluator. His job would be to implement Six Sigma, in easy areas and not-so-easy areas. Simplest applications would be on non-educational issues – heating/ventilation of buildings, ordering materials, lawn and building maintenance. The toughest would be on the curriculum side – teachers, textbooks, testing materials and courses. Hodges received Six Sigma training, advancing to Black Belt status, and began the process of implementation. "The biggest difficulty," said Hodges, "was the H factor: The human side of things." Those who have participated in a Six Sigma deployment, or any other change of culture in an organization, know there is a certain amount of shock, or resistance, which comes with change. In schools, that shock seems a bit more intense than in many other institutions. Issues peculiar to teachers also had to be dealt with as Hodges pursued his mission. Teachers Good at Jumping to SolutionsTeachers, according to Hodges (who is one), are great at solutions. Often before they have even identified the problem, they have a solution – or two or three solutions. So, Hodges began every meting with teachers by asking these questions: 1.
What's the problem? ("Often, I'd get two or three problems they had thought were only one.") 2.
How do you know? 3.
What are some of the root causes? 4.
What treatment can we apply? 5.
What are the results likely to be? After many repetitions of this process, the teachers began to see the value of identifying the problem before tackling how to fix it, Hodges said. One story in particular illustrated how understanding a complaint requires an understanding of the real problem: Many of the teachers frequently complained among themselves about the poor air quality in the classrooms. Poor air quality led to increased absences, more asthma attacks and labels of "sick building syndrome." The problem was examined carefully using a Six Sigma approach. An environmental specialist was involved, and data was gathered and analyzed by a team consisting of a teacher and a custodian. What they found surprised everyone. Some of the teachers kept animals in their classrooms, with no protocol for caring for them or cleaning the cages or other husbandry issues. Some teachers, for lack of appropriate space, had placed books, papers and other materials on top of ventilators, thereby blocking effective air circulation in those rooms. Once the factors were identified and analyzed, curative measures could be discussed, chosen and implemented. The result of the Six Sigma project was clean air. Plus, the teachers were thrilled that their grievances had been listened to, and that a solution had been found. To top it off, the school district was honored with an indoor air quality award. Educational Issue: A Textbook ExampleOf course, the air issue was a building problem – not in the strictest sense an educational concern. Using Six Sigma on an educational issue was another matter. But the district had many educational problems that needed investigation. For example, high schools within the district, Hodges explained, were not all teaching the same curriculum. That was a problem in the face of the increased accountability being required of the district, as well as the U.S. Department of Education's "leave no child behind" quality initiative. Since course outlines and the choice of textbooks were left up to individual schools, it was going to be impossible for the district to assess students with a standardized test. Students at each school were learning a different body of knowledge. "We had the teachers apply Six Sigma tools," Hodges said. With careful use of the methodology, the teachers analyzed every aspect of the problem, and began to see that it was quantifiable. The result was to pilot one textbook through the ninth and tenth grade levels (and advanced eighth grade) in all schools in the district. At the end of that period, with all students literally "on the same page," they would be able to test on a particular core of knowledge. Test results would be quantifiable, and there would be the added benefit of a cost savings. With all the schools buying the same textbooks, a larger discount could be negotiated. "The key," Hodges said, "was taking us out of the way we were used to thinking." Forcing a different pattern of thinking brought a newer, clearer vision of what could be done. Six Sigma for the FutureHodges is full of ideas for new projects and issues that he has long wanted to explore, both on the business side and the educational side. Among these are: l
Using a web-based system (which already exists) to assess what the students actually know. l
Employing an Internet resource to order textbooks, so that one person, and not four, can order books for the coming school year, and then check the distribution of those books as they are shipped to the various schools. l
Finding out why teachers are hired to perform one function, and end up doing something entirely different. This happens quite frequently, Hodges noted. A workable online system for applications for teaching positions is one of Hodges' pet projects. The district had one, "but no one used it," he said. A new system is now under development. It is being designed with data gathered from analyzing and testing the old system which had multiple deficiencies. The concept – to eliminate some of the paperwork in job applications – was admirable. "But there was no customer satisfaction in the program," Hodges said. The old online system was difficult to use, cumbersome and tended to quit on users before they had finished the application. The best thing about Six Sigma in the schools, according to Hodges, is that, with help from his colleagues, he has been able to effect change in areas that everyone agreed needed serious overhauling. Six Sigma is now so integral to how things are done in this school system that Hodges teaches it in his classes. "I teach students to follow the same methodology I've had their teachers use." With that background, those students will be way ahead of their classmates in college - not to mention the workplace.
对“好”的回答一定要点个"赞",回答者需要你的鼓励!
已邀请:

sean1981 (威望:0) (广东 东莞) 电子制造 员工

赞同来自:

计划是27号完成,想不到下午没什么事,就用来翻译了,译文如下:

使用六西格玛来解决公立学校系统的问题
在所有六西格玛的创新应用中,没有比科罗拉多州正在使用的方法更令人感兴趣了-把六西格玛应用在公立学校系统的各个方面。 这些方面包括任何一个学区的核心-教室。
-玛丽.拉夫(爱六西格玛 的特约撰稿人)
在所有六西格玛的新的和创新应用中, 没有比科罗拉多州正在使用的方法更令人感兴趣了-把六西格玛应用在公立学校系统的各个方面。 这些方面包括任何一个学区的核心-教室。
二年前,商人吉姆.威格尔,他也是美国科罗拉多州桑顿区亚当斯县12学区的学校董事会主席,给他的董事会成员带来一个不同寻常的假日礼物。每个成员都收到一份由彼得潘德,罗伯特纽曼和罗兰卡瓦纳夫联合编写的麦格劳希尔 2000版本六西格玛方法书籍的复印本。他们的假日任务就是阅读这本书并备在新年的第一次董事公议上进行讨论。
威格尔的公司主要生产花岗岩台面并实践过六西格玛,因此威格尔深知这个方法理论对提高生产工艺的的潜力. 但他知道说服学校董事会并向他们传递六西格玛能力的价值是很艰难的。即使董事会的很多成员都同意这些方法理论可以适用于任何工艺,他们并不太相信这些方法也可适用在教育方面。但他们同意先进行对培训项目的研究及可接受这次挑战的顾问人选的确定。
任务并不简单,目标是把六西格玛应用在学区的每个方面。第一个困难是确定一个对公立学校系统工作服务的顾问. 在经过一些调查及失败的尝试后,彼得.潘德同意作为对学区工作的顾问。他执行了管理层培层和向学校领导展示了六西格玛如何改善学区的工作。
把老师们的怀疑转变为兴趣
顾问对学校全体职员(包括老师们)所做的最重要的事就是通过一个电台广播公案例学习来把他们的怀疑转变为兴趣,他展示了如何通过应用六西格玛把一个有许多缺陷的系统提升为一个面面俱到的系统。全体教师和职员看到了电台广播公司如何通过一步一步的方法来审查一个过程的方方面面,从识别问题和问题的定量化到分析,改善及控制直至最终把过程控制来帮助自已的改善。到现在,学区的老师们都记的电台广播公司的案例学习和如何通过把他们所学到的行动原则来改善一个混乱的系统。
在此期间,一位想解决一些校内系统上存在问题名叫布赖恩.霍奇斯的助理校长加入了此次运动,霍斯奇之前已参加过统计学培训并且熟知六西格玛。他似乎是学区品质改善过程评估员这个职位的最佳人选。他的职责是在那些容易和比较困难的方面执行六西格玛。建筑的供热、排汽系统,原料订购,草坪及建筑维护这些非教育问题方面推行六西格玛是最简单的。而执行六西格玛最困难方面是在学校教学方面,如老师,教科书,试验材料和课程。
霍斯奇接受了向黑带方向发展的六西格玛培训,同时他开始执行六西格玛过程。
“最大的困难是H因子-事情的人为方面” 霍斯奇说道。那些参与过六西格玛部署或组织内其它文化变革活动的人都知道会带来相当大的震惊或由于变革所带来的阻力。学校改革方面所带来的震撼似乎比其他行业更加强烈。因为当霍斯奇在进行他的任务时不得不处理关于教师们的特殊问题。
教师们善于跳跃性解决问题
根据霍斯奇的说法(他自己也是老师),教师们在解决问题中很重要。经常在甚至问题都还没识别的时候,他们已经有一种或2种或3种解决方法了,因此霍斯奇每次在和老师们会议开始之前都会问以下题:
1. 什么问题?(”通常,我所认为的二个或三个问题在他们看来只是同一个问题”)。
2. 你怎么知道?
3. 这些问题一些根本原因有那些?
4. 我们可以采取什么样的对策?
5. 会造成什么样的结果?
“在多次重复这些活动之后,教师们开始理解决问题之前问题识别的价值” 霍斯奇说道。
一个特别的故事阐述了只有真正理解问题才能真正理解一件投诉:
很多老师之间都会抱怨教室糟糕的空气质量。糟糕的空气质量导致缺勤率增加,更多学生哮喘发作并被贴上“病态楼宇综合症”的标签。这个问题通过一个六西格玛方法仔细的检查,一位环境专家也参与此次活动,且数据由一位教师和监护人组成的小组来进行收集和分析。他们的发现结果让每个人都感到惊讶。 一些教师把宠物带到教室而又没有对宠物照料或清洁笼子或其它宠物管理问题管理规定。一些教师由于教室空间的不足,把书本,报纸和其它材料放在通风口的的上面,因而堵碍了这些教室空气的有效流通。
一但这些因素被识别并分析,就可以讨论,选择并执行解决的方法。 六西格玛项目的结果就是清新的空气。另外,教师们会由于他们的抱怨被重视且找到解决方法而感到激动,除此以外,学区还被授予了室内空气质量奖。
教学类问题:一个教科书例子
当然,空气问题是建筑问题,不是严格意义上的教学问题。 在一个教学问题上使用六西格玛是另外一回事。但是学区有很多教学问题需要调查。例如,学区的高中学样并不是都教同教同样的课程,霍斯奇解释道。这在学区面临的日益加强的问责制及美国教育部“不让一个孩子掉队”宣言下是一个问题。由于课程提纲及教材的选择是由学校自己决定,这对于学区不可能用一种标准来评估学生。每个学校的学生学习的知识体都是不同的。
“我们有的老师在应用六西格玛工具” 霍斯奇说道。随着方法理论的谨慎使用,教师们分析了问题的每一个方面,并开始看到问题是可定量化的。这项结果开始在学区所有学校的九年级和十年级(和更高的八年级)的一种教材上进行试点.在这个试点的后期,由于所有学生都是学习同样的教材,他们可以用同种方法来进行测试。测试结果将是可量化的,且将带来成本节约的效益。由于所有的学校都买同样的教材,更大的折扣就可以协商。
六西格玛对未来的作用
霍斯奇对在商业和教育方面的新项目及他一直想探索的新问题有充分的想法,这些想法如下:
●使用基于WEB的系统(实际已在使用)来评估学生实际所学到的东西。
●利用互联网资源来订购教材,这样只要一个人,而不是四个人,就可以订购下学年的教材了,且当这些教材送到不同学校时可检查它们的分发情况。
●找出为什么老师们都是做相同的职能,但最终的结果却完全不相同。而这些情况发生的相当频繁,霍斯奇说道。
一个可行的教学职位在线申请系统是霍奇斯的得意项目之一。“学区以前有一个这样的系统,但没有人去利用它”他说道。一个新的系统现在正在部署。这个新系统正在从分析和测试有多种缺陷老系统中所收集的数据来进行设计。“消除职位申请上一些书面手续工作的理念是令人称赞的,但程序中没有客户满意度统计模块”霍斯奇说道。那套旧的在线系统操作很麻烦,繁锁的操作让用户在没有完成申请之前就想退出。
根据霍斯奇的说法,在学校中关于六西格玛最美好的事情就是由于他的同事们的协助,他可以在大家都认为需要大力整修的方面进行有效的改善。现在,六西格玛已成为霍斯奇所教授学生们这套校园系统运作的必需部分.”我指导学生们使用的方法理论和我曾教他们的老师所使用的方法理论是一样的”。
在这种教育背景下,在大学期间,这些学生就将超过大学里的其它同学,更不用说在将来的工作中。

8 个回复,游客无法查看回复,更多功能请登录注册

发起人

扫一扫微信订阅<6SQ每周精选>