您还没有绑定微信,更多功能请点击绑定

杜邦SHE审核报告(中英文对照)

在安全、健康、环境保护方面的定点评估
(2003年6月23日)

对在安全、健康、环境保护方面的定点评估主要是以查看程序/系统、现场巡回、定点访问及查看各类记录等方式加以完成的。
丁明官 亚洲采购中心,采购专员
摘要:
本次调查以中国的相关条例并参照杜邦之“安全、健康、环境保护”标准及工业最优实践导则等为依据。
总的来说,本次调查活动仅要求﹡﹡达到最基本的规定。无论如何,事实证明﹡﹡未掌握对相关条例的升级,甚至于可以说是既缺乏对规定的知识或了解(事实上也是未按相关规定办事)。
由于本次调查过程中,﹡﹡方面未能在某些领域的文件查阅方面提供认可(包括数据),并且主要的经理在调查时缺席,故我们无法评估当前的操作是否完全符合相关的规定。本次按相关规定对﹡﹡实际操作的调查(在安全、健康、环境保护方面)中发现,叉车司机及电焊工均未从当地的政府获得相应的许可证。
结论:
本次对安全、健康、环境保护方面的定点评估与研究对一些必需的、重要的领域进行了识别与评价,目前急需要加以改变(改进)的是工作操作、程序扩展、人力资源培训以及操作纪律以保证实现持续的完善。
无论如何,在业务谈判期间,﹡﹡应该对下列事项提供确认,所有从事专门的、危险性工作的操作者(政府部门有明确要求的)均应该参加适当的培训,并从政府部门获得相应的许可。
安全、健康、环境保护方面的完整程序需要加以更新,并要求覆盖所有的条例要求,并保留操作纪律。

安全与防火
﹡﹡公司有相应的安全方针,并采用上墙形式,所有的安全规程均较为笼统,未覆盖到条例的所有要求,如防火管理等。在现场缺乏一些重要的规程,如紧急疏散指示和限制工作区程序等。操作规程未与“安全、健康、环境保护的要求”等完全结合起来,另外还包括PPE要求的一些要素。
有两人在车间进行地面油漆,但未具备工作允许及监控。在现场没有油漆工管理规程。
有一名操作工出示了他的个人呼吸器,并告知其未收到适合的培训怎样使用及维护。
车间主任声称未发生过任何的伤害及火灾事件,但注意到在仓库中有一个燃烧过的接线盒。
我们注意到,在三车间的走道及门被产品及包装材料给堵住了。
在码头的吊车低下放置有破损的托盘。
我检查了一名叉车司机,他说他未获相应的许可,并称他每天检查叉车,但无法向我们出示相应的记录。
我检查了一名电焊工,他说他也未获相应的许可证(资格证)。
我们注意到氧气瓶和燃料被放在一起。
有三个工人在仓储区工作,但无任何标志用于警示其相应的维修工作。
我注意到有四名工人在厂道上装货物,并被告知这是一项常规性的工作。
仓库中放满了包装材料、产品及油。
在﹡﹡的办公大楼内有关于出口标志及应急灯,但在车间、实验室及仓库内则没有。
﹡﹡公司科技大楼内有洒水装置(侦测报警系统),但在车间、实验室及仓库内则没有。他们的防火系统通过一些灭火器组成,并依靠当地的消防单位协助。
我被告知﹡﹡公司有紧急反应组织,但未见他们提供最基本的相应记录。
政府消防队离﹡﹡公司很近,大约有5分钟的路程。
﹡﹡公司未建立过程安全管理系统,且未开展过程危险分析或结果分析。
﹡﹡公司提供了一项防火机构出具的关于使用危险化学品许可,但未能提供任何经由卫生管理机构批准的关于使用这些设施、物品的文件。
﹡﹡公司未能提供设施方面的设计基础,故很难保证设施(工程)达到所有的政府要求的、火灾安全与防护方面的要求。
可燃性试剂被放置在实验室内,但无第二层的密封处理,需要作安置。
现场的总体观察显示了﹡﹡公司薄弱的防护与维修项目,对在运行的设备很少或不充分的进行防护。
建议:
即时的培训项目是必需的。﹡﹡公司应该获得关于工程设计基础的信息以及防火管理的文件、卫生管理机构对工程/设备的批准文件。﹡﹡公司应该实施一项正式的对过程危险分析,并列出一份行动计划,用于控制安全及防火方面的风险。设备台帐管理在防护方面需要扩展,优化及贯彻。﹡﹡公司应该考虑如何消除在资源方面的风险,以确保设备固有的安全。

过程安全管理(PSM)
﹡﹡公司未能提供有关设计基础方面的信息(指锅炉系统方面),缺乏放射性物数据用于衡量设备是否按要求运行。
﹡﹡公司未对过程安全管理建立相应的管理系统或规程。
﹡﹡公司未能提供波动图或简化了的过程波动图。
﹡﹡公司未开展过程危险分析。
﹡﹡公司未能提供在技术、人力资料及设备方面的任何程序或信息,此处指的是为过程安全管理而需要的审核检查表的信息。
﹡﹡公司从未开展过公司范围内的应急训练。公司灭火员操作练习每年开展一次,但未能提供相应的记录。
建议:
﹡﹡应该获得有关设计基础方面的信息(其用于关键过程设备),如锅炉系统、液化气储罐等。﹡﹡公司应建立过程安全管理系统,并扩展相关用于过程安全管理要素的程序及审核检查表:技术、人力、设备,然后开始运行这套管理系统。﹡﹡公司应该定期开展公司范围内的应急训练活动,并考虑如何消除资源风险,以确保过程固有的安全。

职业健康管理
﹡﹡公司尚未组建起职业健康管理系统。
﹡﹡公司报告称,职业体格检查监督按年开展,但是未能提供检查记录。
建议:
公司需要对政府关于职业健康管理方面的要求有所熟悉,并制订一项可行的行动计划,公司需要扩充关于职业健康方面的管理系统,并需要对以下列明的职业健康相关事项作改进。

职业健康危险
﹡﹡公司未开展任何的正式职业健康风险评估,或提供一些例证。公司报告称其对可能的职业健康危险,如以下列出的各项保持察觉,但不并不够。
以下列出与设备有关的职业健康危险:
1/化学品
在生产过程中使用到一些化学品,但﹡﹡方面称考虑到保密方面的需要,未出示细节。﹡﹡公司向操作者提供了一些不太适合的用品用于操作这些化学品。
2/原材料存放区的尘埃
﹡﹡公司未对尘埃浓度进行监测,但是现场审核期间,在上述的区域均可看到。
3/工效学
我们注意到,操作者以一种令人不愉快的(蹲着)姿势在清理纱管(细纱),通过交流后发现,管理层已经察觉这一点,需要作改进。公司利用人工装、卸大部份货物。
4/室内的空气质量
丙酮、硫酸及其他化学试剂并运用于过程中,公司没有因为考虑到对个人的暴露或可燃性而对其在空气中的浓度作监测。
建议:
在操作中需要尽快贯彻对PPE的使用。公司应该对相关区域的尘埃水平、苯酚和其他潜在的对健康造成危险作监测,公司应要求并提供适合的PPE(这里接指的是防护用品)用于使用各种危险品。公司应该开展正式的职业健康风险的评估活动,并制订一项计划用于控制操作者的风险。公司应该考虑并贯彻如何消除资源风险,以确保其符合条例的要求。

体格检查
公司没有关于体格检查方面的程序,公司没有要求对已雇佣人员的检查,或对新员工的监测,我被告知公司实际开展了体格检查与监测,但未能提供任何的记录。
建议:
公司应开展一项正式的对所有的员工的体格检查监测,以及对在车间工作的特殊工种人员健康监测,以了掌握其岗位风险。公司应该建立关于体格检查方面的程序,然后建立起每名员工的健康案卷,并开展职责适合性评估。公司应该定期开展对所有的员工的体格检查监测,并保留及管理有关病例及工伤事故的记录。

固/液废物及管理
固体废物(主要是从废水处理设备中得到的活性泥)被运出去,但﹡﹡方面不知道这些固体废物是如何被处理的,且无法出示相关证据。
建议:
﹡﹡方面应该回顾或审核对固体废水的处理过程,并与其签订一份合同。同时应该回顾和评价废水管理及更新系统的实际状况,以更好地对所有的固/液体废物实施管理。

土地,地下水及地面水
公司未采用地下井水用于水源供应。
公司未对水井的位置是否与公司相近作监测,也未对地下水的质量作调查。
公司未将地下贮罐及地下管路作为一项资源。
有一条河临近公司,,但未提供水质报告或信息。
建议:
公司应该获得并回顾工程设计信息及地下贮罐的安装细节。公司应对河水水质进行监测,包括地下水水质作监测,并开展评估。公司可以建立一项正在进行的监测规程。

水污染控制
公司提供了一份由管理保护局提供的许可证(许可污水排泄到河中)。
公司未建设合适的堤防用于控制洁净水渗漏至装、卸区域。
公司未对供应的将用于生产的水质作监测,公司未发生过供应水质或数量方面的事故,但缺乏数据加以评估。

建议:
公司应开展一项正式的评估活动,认找出污染源,在装、卸区应建立堤防,公司应采取行动以控制污染源。公司应考虑设立一套系统(如ISO14000)以实现持续改进。

空气污染控制
公司有一套设备用于废气,但未能提供任何空气排放许可,以及一些监测数据。
在现场审核过程中,我们检查了灭火器,所有的灭火器均为“1211”型,但无计划对其作更换。

建议:
公司应该获得有关排放数据及排放许可证,并应该评估这些派放数据,并评估空气污染控制的实际状况。公司应该建立一套系统以实现持续改进环境质量。

环境事件及排放
在过去的10个月里,没有危险物资的排放,公司没有一个正式的内部系统用于报告、记录环境事件及排放等。
建议:
公司应该建立一个正式的内部系统用于报告、记录环境事件及排放等。

有毒物质控制
公司没有使用PCB或石棉等
对“好”的回答一定要点个"赞",回答者需要你的鼓励!
已邀请:

zidiaowangyu (威望:0)

赞同来自:

﹡﹡ Evaluation
For
Safety, Health, Environmental
(June 23, 2003)

A site evaluation of SHE was conducted of Procedures, Systems, Field Area tours, spot interviews, and records.

Ding Ming Guan - Asia Sourcing Center, Sourcing Specialist


Summary:
The team based on Chinese regulations and had reference of Dupont SHE standards and industry best practice guideline (NFPA) .

In general terms, the operation only aligns with minimum essential with intent to meet regulations. However, it appears they do not monitor regulation upgrades and appear to be out of regulation in areas from lack of knowledge or understanding.

Since the site could not supply all consent to operate documentation nor data, and the most managers are absence, we can not assess whether or not current operation fully meet regulations. An assessment of current operations against regulations for such items as the operators of fork lift truck and welding are without permits from the local government.

Conclusion:

The SHE evaluation study has identified several areas that need improvement. These improvements primarily require changes in work practices, procedure development, training of personnel and the operational discipline to insure consistent implementation.
However: The site should be requested the following for confirmation during business negotiation.
The all operators with special hazards job which governmental required should attend the proper training and get the permits from the government agency.
The most SHEA procedures needs to be updated for covering all regulation requirements and keep operational discipline.

Safety and Fire Protection
They have the policy of safety which be posted on the wall, the most safety procedures are in general and not cover all regulation requirements such as fire protection management. There are not important procedures in place such as Lock Tag Try and Confined space work procedures. The operational procedures are not integrated SHE requirements and elements such as PPE required.

Two contractors are painting the floor in the workshop without work permit and being monitor. There are not contractor management procedure in place.

One operator showed his personal respirator , I was said that he did not receive proper trained for using and maintenance.

The host claimed that there were not any injuries and fire cases. But we noted one switch was burned in the warehouse.

We noted that the walkway in No. 1 Workshop and gates was obstructed by products and package material.

The damaged plates were stored in disorder under the crane.

I checked one operator of the fork lift truck, he said that he had not got the permit and he claimed to inspect the fork lift truck daily but could not show us the records.

I checked one operator of welding, he said that he had not got the permit also.

We noted that the cylinders of oxygen and fuel were stored together.

There three works are worked in storage area without any sign to warn for the repair work.

I noted that four workers loaded the products on the road, I was confirmed that this was normal work.

The warehouse was full stored by package material and products and oil.

There are exit sign and emergency light in office building, but without it in workshop and lab and warehouse.

The site has sprinkler, detection nor alarm systems in the office building but without it in workshop and warehouse and lab. Their fire protection system consisting of some fire extinguishers and depends on local fire agency response.

I was informed that they have emergency response organization, but they could provide limited related records.

The government fire brigade agency is very close to the site, it is about 5minutes for the distance.

The site did not set up process safety management system, and did not conduct process hazards analysis or consequence analysis.

The site provide one permits of handling hazards chemicals on site from fire protection agency, but could not provide any documents of hygiene administration agency approved for the facility.

The site could not provide any design base of the facility, so it is difficult to ensure this facility meet all of the fire safety and protection codes required by government


Flammable reagents was stored in lab without secondary containment and will need to be installed.

General field observations indicated a weak preventative maintenance program and few or inadequate equipment guards for rotating equipment.

Recommendation:
An immediate training and awareness program would be needed. The site should obtain the information of the facility design base and the documents of fire protection and hygiene administration agency approved for the facility. The site should conduct a formal process hazardous analysis and list a action plan to control the risk of safety and fire protection. An inventory of equipment guarding will need to be developed, prioritized and implemented. The site should consider how to eliminate the risk at the source, to ensure the facility is inherent safety.

Process Safety Management (PSM)

The site could not provided the information of design base for the boilers system. Emission data was not available to determine whether the facilities are operated in compliance.

The site did not set up the management systems program and/or procedures for process safety management.

The site could not provide block flow diagram or simplified process flow diagram.

The site has not conducted a process hazardous analysis.

The site could not provide any procedures or information to align with audit checklist for PSM elements in Technology, Personnel, and Facilities..

The site never conduct sitewide emergency drills. The site conducted extinguisher using exercise on field in annually, but, they could not provide the related records.

Recommendation:
The site should obtain the information of design base for the key process equipment, such as the boiler system and the storage tanks of LPG. The site should set up the PSM system, and develop procedures and audit checklist for PSM element: Technology, Personnel, and Facilities, and begin to run the management system. The site should conduct sitewide emergency drills in routinely. The site should consider how to eliminate the risk at source, ensure the process inherent safety.

Occupational Health Management
The site has not organized an occupational health management system.
They reported that occupational medical surveillance was conducted in annually. However, the site could not provide the surveillance reports.
Recommendations:
The site would need to become familiar with government requirements on occupational health management, and identify a corrective action plan. The site would need to develop a management system of occupational health. The site will need to improve the system of occupational health for items listed below.

Occupational Health Hazards
The site has not conducted any formal occupational health risk assessments nor could they provide sampling data. The site reported they were aware of possible occupational health hazards as outlined below. This does not correct the issues as must control the source.

10 个回复,游客无法查看回复,更多功能请登录注册

发起人

扫一扫微信订阅<6SQ每周精选>